Upload a Photo Upload a Video Add a News article Write a Blog Add a Comment
Blog Feed News Feed Video Feed All Feeds

Folders

All 0
All 34
 

 

NCAA reviewing National Qualifying Procedures

Published by
Coach Matthew Barreau   Sep 22nd 2010, 7:35pm
Comments

The Division I Championships/Sports Management Cabinet charged the Division I Men’s and Women’s Track and Field Committee to provide recommendations on ways to improve the two-site preliminary-round qualifying format that was implemented this spring in outdoor track and field.

Cabinet members, who met Tuesday and Wednesday in Indianapolis, reviewed feedback on the two-site preliminary-round format, which included opportunities for improvement, and asked for suggestions on enhancing these events by the cabinet’s next meeting in February 2011.

The cabinet has discussed the format of track and field regionals in recent years, even considering whether to eliminate the qualifying meets, since it costs institutions to send their track and field student-athletes to the regionals.

The two-site preliminary-round qualifying format replaces a four-regional format that existed before.

Among the alternatives moving forward is a plan the cabinet has seen before called a “24/8” model, which is the result of a collaborative effort between the track and field committee and the U.S. Track and Field Coaches and Cross Country Coaches Association. The model would replace the regional qualifying meets and create a one-site championship format that would accommodate 32 participants in individual events and 24 teams for relay events.

The top 24 declared individuals in each individual event would have access to the championships meet. The remaining eight participants would be the next best conference champions decided by a national season-best, descending-order list.

In relays, the top 18 declared teams would have access to the NCAA championship meet, with the next best six conference champions filling out the field. Again, that would be determined by a national season-best, descending-order list.



Read the full article at: www.ncaa.org
1 comment(s)
Coach Matthew Barreau
I think we should go back to a straight descending order list. The D1 Championships are the only major level of competition that has gone away from this; D2, D3, NAIA, and even the USATF Championships are all based on a descending order list. The primary argument against this was that some schools were put at a disadvantage due to climactic conditions or budget restrictions (read NE schools and small schools). Without going into a lengthy diatribe, I'll sum it up like this... DEAL WITH IT! Every school has challenges. But what people forget is that every school has advantages as well! Coaches shouldn't take a job and then complain about their circumstances. Rather, they need to embrace their situation, and find a way to make it flourish. All the great coaches have done so. Quit complaining, and find a way to be great yourself.
History for NCAA D1 Outdoor Championships
YearResultsVideosNewsPhotosBlogs
2024     18    
2023 1 195 16 309  
2022 1 159 17 2227  
Show 18 more
 
+PLUS highlights
+PLUS coverage
Live Events
Get +PLUS!